http://hg.omfa.de/prosody-hg/ en-us spec/util_argparse_spec.lua revision history http://hg.omfa.de/prosody-hg/log/aac30c5ee334/spec/util_argparse_spec.lua
We have value_params now, which has overlapping behaviour and support
for '--foo bar' as well as '--foo=bar' (only the latter syntax is supported by
kv_params).

The remaining unique property of kv_params is that when used without a value,
i.e. '--foo' then it defaults to boolean true, and when used as '--no-foo' it
defaults to boolean false. This is a useful thing that value_params don't do.

So this commit officially renames kv_params to bool_params (kv_params is still
allowed for now, for some backwards compatibility).

Breaking change though: if any kv_params expected a value, it will no longer
work (--foo=bar will not work). In this case the param should be moved to
value_params.]]> Matthew Wild <mwild1@gmail.com> Thu, 19 Jun 2025 11:19:13 +0100 http://hg.omfa.de/prosody-hg/log/81856814d74f/spec/util_argparse_spec.lua
After recent changes, '--foo bar' was working, but '--foo=bar' was not. The
test had a typo (?) (bar != baz) and because util.argparse is not strict by
default, the typo was not caught.

The typo caused the code to take a different path, and bypassed the buggy
handling of --foo=bar options.

I've preserved the existing test (typo and all!) because it's still an
interesting test, and ensures no unintended behaviour changes compared to the
old code.

However I've added a new variant of the test, with strict mode enabled and the
typo fixed. This test failed due to the bug, and this commit introduces a fix.]]> Matthew Wild <mwild1@gmail.com> Tue, 11 Mar 2025 18:27:36 +0000 http://hg.omfa.de/prosody-hg/log/48c056c10e5a/spec/util_argparse_spec.lua Matthew Wild <mwild1@gmail.com> Mon, 17 Feb 2025 18:24:23 +0000 http://hg.omfa.de/prosody-hg/log/4ee9a912ceea/spec/util_argparse_spec.lua
These are gathered into arrays]]> Kim Alvefur <zash@zash.se> Wed, 05 Jan 2022 04:46:27 +0100 http://hg.omfa.de/prosody-hg/log/cc84682b8429/spec/util_argparse_spec.lua
The second return value is (not insensibly) assumed to be an error. Instead of
returning a value there in the success case, copy the positional arguments
into the existing opts table.]]> Matthew Wild <mwild1@gmail.com> Mon, 25 Apr 2022 15:24:56 +0100 http://hg.omfa.de/prosody-hg/log/97c1399720c2/spec/util_argparse_spec.lua Kim Alvefur <zash@zash.se> Tue, 12 Oct 2021 14:54:04 +0200 http://hg.omfa.de/prosody-hg/log/d2a939e21671/spec/util_argparse_spec.lua Kim Alvefur <zash@zash.se> Tue, 12 Oct 2021 14:48:21 +0200