view spec/util_hashring_spec.lua @ 10801:2b97aac0ea3c

mod_csi_simple: Don't consider presence errors as important A large share of `<presence type=error>` appears to be noise from large public channels and failed presence probes. The later at least should count as presence updates, which are currently considered unimportant. See also 8cecb85e4bc4 which is partly reverted here. The intent there was probably mostly about message (delivery) errors, which should be considered important.
author Kim Alvefur <zash@zash.se>
date Tue, 05 May 2020 23:08:47 +0200
parents de43ca319184
children 249b01adc54a
line wrap: on
line source

local hashring = require "util.hashring";

describe("util.hashring", function ()

	local sha256 = require "util.hashes".sha256;

	local ring = hashring.new(128, sha256);

	it("should fail to get a node that does not exist", function ()
		assert.is_nil(ring:get_node("foo"))
	end);

	it("should support adding nodes", function ()
		ring:add_node("node1");
	end);

	it("should return a single node for all keys if only one node exists", function ()
		for i = 1, 100 do
			assert.is_equal("node1", ring:get_node(tostring(i)))
		end
	end);

	it("should support adding a second node", function ()
		ring:add_node("node2");
	end);

	it("should fail to remove a non-existent node", function ()
		assert.is_falsy(ring:remove_node("node3"));
	end);

	it("should succeed to remove a node", function ()
		assert.is_truthy(ring:remove_node("node1"));
	end);

	it("should return the only node for all keys", function ()
		for i = 1, 100 do
			assert.is_equal("node2", ring:get_node(tostring(i)))
		end
	end);

	it("should support adding multiple nodes", function ()
		ring:add_nodes({ "node1", "node3", "node4", "node5" });
	end);

	it("should disrupt a minimal number of keys on node removal", function ()
		local orig_ring = ring:clone();
		local node_tallies = {};

		local n = 1000;

		for i = 1, n do
			local key = tostring(i);
			local node = ring:get_node(key);
			node_tallies[node] = (node_tallies[node] or 0) + 1;
		end

		--[[
		for node, key_count in pairs(node_tallies) do
			print(node, key_count, ("%.2f%%"):format((key_count/n)*100));
		end
		]]

		ring:remove_node("node5");

		local disrupted_keys = 0;
		for i = 1, n do
			local key = tostring(i);
			if orig_ring:get_node(key) ~= ring:get_node(key) then
				disrupted_keys = disrupted_keys + 1;
			end
		end
		assert.is_equal(node_tallies["node5"], disrupted_keys);
	end);

	it("should support removing multiple nodes", function ()
		ring:remove_nodes({"node2", "node3", "node4", "node5"});
	end);

	it("should return a single node for all keys if only one node remains", function ()
		for i = 1, 100 do
			assert.is_equal("node1", ring:get_node(tostring(i)))
		end
	end);

end);